Brown Out?

Well, I knew he wasn't Ronald Reagan, but I had hopes that Scott Brown wouldn't be snookered by all the "bipartisan" crap talk swirling around Washington. Alas, my hopes have been dashed already.

JASmius counsels: Jen, take my advice: CHILL:

A month after being crowned the darling of national conservatives, Republican Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts is being branded "Benedict Brown" for siding with Democrats in favor of a jobs bill endorsed by the Obama administration.

Like the four other GOP senators who joined him, the man who won the late Democrat Edward Kennedy's seat says it's about jobs, not party politics. And that may be good politics, too.

The four other GOP senators who broke ranks — Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, George Voinovich of Ohio and Christopher "Kit" Bond of Missouri — also were criticized on Tuesday. But Brown was the big target on conservative Web sites, talk shows and even the Facebook page his campaign has promoted as an example of his new-media savvy.

"We campaigned for you. We donated to your campaign. And you turned on us like every other RINO," said one writer, using the initials for "Republican-In-Name-Only."

Let's, as we like to say, take these in order:

1) Brownie was "the darling of conservatives" because he bagged Ted Kennedy's seat, not any hairlipesque rocked-ribbed Reaganism.  It was pointed out before that special election that he's moderately pro-abortion, and that his voting record in the Massachusetts state senate was on the left side of the GOP caucus.  And even if it wasn't, he was running in...well, Massachusetts.  There's a reason why Orrin Hatch is from Utah and Tom Coburn is from Oklahoma, after all.  If we want the GOP to be competitive in the northeast, we're going to have to live with 'Pubbies like Scottie B. that will be with us most of the time.  Shinola, the point he hammered during his campaign second most after being the 41st vote against ObamaCare was that he'd be "an independent voice" for the Bay State in the Senate.  Seriously, you TPers didn't know this?

2) His was not the decisive vote.  With Voinovich and Bond (both retiring this year) and the Maine Wonder Twins crossing over, Dirty Harry had enough votes for cloture with or without Senator Beefcake.  So why not use the opportunity to build up indy street cred when it won't really cost his party anything?.  If he'd been the difference-maker, that'd have been another matter, but as it unfolded, this seems like, if not a tactical no-brainer, than at least no big flipping deal.

3) Yes, we know what the economy needs - well, what it REALLY needs is Barack Obama out of power, but in legislative terms, it needs tax cuts, spending cuts, regulation cuts, divestitures, and the end of "stimuli," bailouts, nationalizations, government takeovers, tax hikes, currency debasement, and all the other statist body blows that seem lined up from here to bankruptcy and which are keeping this economy mired in depression.  But Dirty Harry's Hogzilla sequel is the $15 billion hors dourve to Crazy Nancy's ten course lard banquet.  Toward which end of this fiscal scale d'ya think the final bill is going land a-closer?  And d'ya really think Scottie B is gonna turn coat when it really counts?:

We need to put partisanship aside to put people back to work. This jobs bill is far from perfect, and ideally would include deeper and broader tax cuts. I supported this measure because it does contain some tax relief that will help Massachusetts businesses put people back to work. Right now, this is a tax-cutting bill. But if it comes back to the Senate full of pork, waste, fraud and abuse, I reserve the right to vote against it.
If it doesn't come back to the Senate full of pork, waste, fraud, and abuse, I'll pose nude in the Scott Brown commemorative issue of Playgirl.  And if the junior senator from Massachusetts votes for it anyway, then y'all can fight over which notion makes you more apt to throw up.  Until then, learn how politics works, and stop making perfection the enemy of the good.
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2010/02/what-a-disappointment.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Brown Out?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://hardstarboardblog.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/3352

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jennifer published on February 23, 2010 4:40 AM.

"Americans Do Not Want This Brand Of Health Care Reform" was the previous entry in this blog.

NCPA Daily Policy Digest (2/23/10) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

2004-2007

1996-2000

Best of JASmius

Television & Movie Reviews/Multimedia

The Sports Page

Powered by Movable Type 4.01

 Subscribe to Hard Starboard

 Subscribe to Hard Starboard

As linked by Real Clear Politics

"Hard Starboard has some relevant thoughts....the most original, and humorous, I've seen so far." - "Ensign" Ed Morrissey
Google
Technorati search
View blog authority

Blogs that link here

Add to Technorati Favorites
Solar X-rays:

Geomagnetic Field:
>
Status
Status
 
From n3kl.org Sermon Archive

Out Of The Miry Clay

Due On Christmas

God Made Playdough

Growing Together

Jenaya’s Quote Board

Little Pink Feet

Living A Quiet Life

Martinbliss

Rachel’s Blog

Red-Headed Wilsons

Ryan & Stephanie Buczak

The Adventures Of The SuperMillers

Tim Miller's Arabian Adventure

The Fenton Four

The Miller Brothers

The Terrible Tuesday Machine

Wycliffe Support

Institute for Creation Research

Klingon Gospel Wheel

Evangelical Blogroll