Recently in Capitol Hill Category

Asst Natl Dir Mellie said 8 hours, 12 minutes ago:

The Senate will convene at 3:00 pm today and will be in Morning Business until 4:30 pm. At 4:30 pm, the Senate will turn to Executive Session to consider Executive Calendar #249, Stephen A. Higginson, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit. At 5:30 pm, we will vote on confirmation. We expect this to be the only vote today.

Tomorrow at a time to be determined by the two Leaders, the Senate will resume consideration of H.R. 2112, the Agriculture/Rural Development Appropriations bill (vehicle for the Ag, CJS, and THUD minibus) and conduct the following votes:

(1) Coburn amendment #800 (reduce Rural Development Agency funding);

(2) Paul amendment #821 (increase highway bridge fund program) (60 votes required);

(3) DeMint amendment #763 (no funds for rule re: asthma inhalers);

(4) Crapo amendment #814 (implementation of Title VII of Dodd-Frank bill) (60 votes required);

(5) Lee Motion to Recommit with instructions to report back with spending reduced to FY2011 levels;

(6) Coburn amendment #801 (eliminate funding for the Small Community Air Service Development Program); and

(7) Final passage

After we complete action on the minibus, it is unclear what legislative item Leader Reid will turn to on the Senate floor. Press reports suggest Leader Reid could turn to a $60 billion infrastructure bill which would include a surtax on small businesses. We have not seen the text of this package but will share as soon as we have it. We also expect to have a GOP side-by-side.

I've pasted a press release below regarding the House passage of the 3% withholding bill (which was introduced in the Senate by Senator Scott Brown). Leader McConnell will push for passage of this bill during this work period.

Items which are possible for the November work period include: CR (expires 11/18); Appropriations minibus (likely Energy and Water, Financial Services, and one of the following: State/Foreign Operations, Homeland Security, or Legislative Branch), Infrastructure legislation, Nominations, Jobs legislation, 3% withholding bill, and DOD Authorization.

As you may know, the House released their 2012 calendar last week. A number of you have asked when the 2012 Senate Schedule will be released. We expect Leader Reid to announce the schedule sometime this week. We will pass it

Two other quick scheduling notes: Friday, November 11th is Veterans Day. Also, Leader Reid announced November 14th is a No Vote Day.

_______________________

Lanier Swann

For Immediate Release, Thursday, October 20, 2011

A Bill Job Creators Actually Want

'The President asked us to come together and pass pieces of his bill. Here's one that all 100 Senators should agree on. Let's vote on it, and prove the skeptics wrong by acting in a bipartisan fashion on something that the job creators in this country actually want.'

Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following statement on the Senate floor Thursday regarding a vote on the bipartisan Withholding Tax Relief Act:

"Everybody in this body knows that the American people want us to do something about the jobs crisis.

"What Republicans have been saying is that raising taxes on business owners isn't the way to do it.

"So what we've done is we've combed through the President's latest stimulus bill looking for things we can actually support, for things that don't punish the very people we're counting on to create jobs.

"In other words, since the President never asked if there was anything in this legislation we could support, we've done it ourselves.

"And it turns out there's a very sensible provision in there that would help businesses across the country.

"In fact, it's identical to a bill Senator Brown introduced with 30 co-sponsors earlier this year, many of them Democrats: Senator Begich, Senator Klobuchar, Senator Pryor, Senator Tester, Senator Franken and Senator McCaskill--they're all co-sponsors of Senator Brown's bill.

"What this bill does is it repeals an existing requirement that government agencies at the state, local, and federal level withhold three percent of every payment to any contractor they do business with.

"This is money contractors may very well end up getting back from the IRS at some point long after the job is done, but in the meantime, the government gets to hold on to it instead of allowing the businesses to invest it in jobs and the economy.

"This is money these companies could be putting toward hiring workers and growing their businesses, but it's going to the IRS instead, basically as a zero-interest loan to the federal government in Washington.

"Now, I know that members on both sides of the aisle are hearing from constituents about how burdensome this regulation is.

"That's why President Obama himself already embraced delaying its implementation in his first Stimulus bill, and proposed delaying it again in his latest stimulus bill.

"And that's why Senator Brown got so many Democrat sponsors when he proposed a full repeal.

"Like the President's bill, this bill is fully offset. And the offset we're proposing has been supported by our friends across the aisle.

"In fact, the last time it saw a vote, I think 81 Senators voted for it. So the bill we're proposing is bipartisan, and the offset we're proposing is bipartisan.

"There's no reason in the world that Democrats -- including the President -- should oppose it. If delaying this legislation was a good idea before, repealing it should be an even better idea now.

"This bill is supported by hundreds of business groups representing job creators across America.

"We should come together and act right now; make it easier for them to create jobs for a change, not harder.

"The President asked us to come together and pass pieces of his bill.

"Here's one that all 100 Senators should agree on.

"Let's vote on it, and prove the skeptics wrong by acting in a bipartisan fashion on something that the job creators in this country actually want."

####

Enhanced by Zemanta
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/a-bill-job-creators-actually-w.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions

October 28, 2011

Here's another recommendation the NCPA recently delivered to the Super Committee -- a solution for Social Security.

Last week, many of you thought it was great to let future retirees start saving for their own retirement but you were concerned about current retirees -- what's going to happen to them?

Our recommendation calls for everyone at age 55 or older to receive all promised Social Security benefits. Everyone else with at least 35 years of full-time work would be guaranteed a minimum level of return. If any qualifying worker's total benefit falls below the minimum, the federal government would supplement that worker's benefit. So individuals have responsibility for their own retirement, but Social Security provides exactly what it was intended to be: a safety net.

Thanks for your support!

Richard W. Walker
Chief Operating Officer

Enhanced by Zemanta
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/more-for-the-super-committee---2.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/chairman-ryan-pisses-in-face-o.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/a-new-american-renaissance.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions

Here's to Marcy Kaptur's roto-rootering!


 

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/joe-the-congressman.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions

Asst Natl Dir Mellie said 5 days ago:

Email Message from the Senate Rupblican Communication Center:

Designed To Fail

Senate Democrats Block 'Important' Part Of President's Plan, Another 'Narrowly Targeted Exercise In 2012 Politics'

Senate Democrats Reject 'Important' Part Of The President's Stimulus Bill. (S. 726, Roll Call Vote #178, Cloture Motion Rejected 57-43: R 47-0, D 10-41, I 0-2, 10/20/11) View that Here:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00178

JAY CARNEY: 'They're All Important, They're All Of Equal Value' Q: "Can you give us any guidance on which part [of the president's bill] is likely to come up first?" CARNEY: "... It really doesn't matter to us, because they're all important, they're all of equal value..." (White House Press Briefing, 10/17/11)

A 'Narrowly Targeted Exercise In 2012 Politics'

"President Barack Obama didn't do much to bring along lawmakers on his jobs bill -- and it showed... the relentless focus on the American Jobs Act wasn't about racking up a legislative win. It was always about laying the foundation for ... 2012." ("Obama Looks Past Hill On Jobs Bill," Politico, 10/11/11)

"The reality in Congress is this bill has virtually no chance of passing and Democrats know that." (Kate Bolduan, CNN's Situation Room, 10/19)

"...narrowly targeted exercise in 2012 politics." ("The Obama Bus Trip: A Political Guide," Politico, 10/17/11)

"...Obama's latest attempt to combine campaigning for his jobs bill with campaigning for his re-election." ("Obama Touring To Support Pieces Of Jobs Bill," AP, 10/17/11)

"...Senate Democrats planned action first on a longshot plan to help states... In campaign mode on the road, Obama accused Republican senators of saying no..." ("Obama Seeks Votes On Jobs, Piece By Piece," AP, 10/17/11)

'A Major Component Of His Reelection Strategy'

VP JOE BIDEN: 'Are we campaigning? ... Yes!' "Vice President Joe Biden lashed out at critics today who have claimed that his and the President's efforts to get a job's bill passed is mere 'campaigning.' 'Are we campaigning?' he said. 'Yes!'" ("Biden: 'Are We Campaigning? Yes!'" NBC, 10/18/11)

"David Axelrod... released a campaign memo on Tuesday signaling that Obama would make his American Jobs Act a major component of his reelection strategy, pummeling Republicans who obstruct his attempts to revive the economy." ("Axelrod To Raise Obama Dough In Arizona," The Hill's Ballot Box, 10/12/11)

'Public Theater,' 'Stagecraft,' A 'Play'

"...the president collected checks and engaged in stagecraft..." ("Barack Obama Stumps For Jobs Bill, Raises Cash During Orlando Stop," St. Petersburg Times, 10/12/11)

"public theater ... they know it's going nowhere." "Democrats may not vote on President Barack Obama's jobs bill just once. They could hold several votes on it, even though they know it's going nowhere. But that's just the public theater." ("Democrats' Plan B On Jobs Bill: Go Smaller," Politico, 10/10/11)

"WH senior aide pre-spinning the Jobs bill defeat in senate: 'first act of a long term play.'" (@Chucktodd, Twitter, 10/11/11)

###
SENATE REPUBLICAN COMMUNICATIONS CENTER

202.228.NEWS

In a Separate Email from the SRCC:

'Spending Money We Don't Have'

Several Senate Democrats Want Everyone To Know That They Oppose The Latest Mini-Stimulus Bill

'Will Not Solve The Fiscal Problem,' Won't 'Guarantee Job Certainty'

SEN. BEN NELSON (D-NE): "If I didn't think much of it on the one thing, you've got to assume that I won't think much of it for something else ... I don't think you increase taxes for new spending." ("Jon Tester, Ben Nelson Unsure On Teachers Bill," Politico, 10/17/11)

SEN. JOE MANCHIN (D-WV): "...this bill will not solve the fiscal problem..." (Sen. Manchin, Floor Remarks, 10/20/11)

· MANCHIN (D-WV): "We've already had two rounds of stimulus funding. This is our third... We only created 33 new jobs the first round [of stimulus] with over $217 million... We have to be responsible, and basically if spending money would fix our problems in America, we'd have no problems." (Sen. Manchin, Floor Remarks, 10/20/11)

SEN. JON TESTER (D-MT): "I'm all for individual states making smart choices with their own money, but giving them federal money and just hoping they'll use it for education and teachers -- well, that's not good enough. With that kind of money, we need guarantees." (Sen. Tester, Floor Remarks, 10/20/11)

· TESTER (D-MT): "Mr. President, only after this final bill is amended to guarantee job certainty will it be able to earn my vote. And in order to amend it, I'm going to vote for the motion to proceed. My vote is a vote for debate that we ought to have." (Sen. Tester, Floor Remarks, 10/20/11)

SEN JOE LIEBERMAN (ID-CT): "[W]hen you look at the president's jobs act, even if you break it down to bite-sized pieces, it's spending money we don't have, and you got to raise taxes to pay for it, and to me, all that just makes the job of the debt reduction committee, the committee itself, even harder." (Fox News, 10/18/11)

· LIEBERMAN (ID-CT): "Our economy needs a jolt. Paying for more state jobs is not going to be that jolt." ("Lieberman: 'Bite-Size' Won't Work," Politico, 10/18/11)

SEN. MARK PRYOR (D-AR): "It's a little philosophical in the sense that I'm not sure federal taxpayers should be paying for teachers and first responders. That's traditionally a state and local matter...I have a big question mark about whether the teacher portion benefits our state at all because of some of the stuff we've done on the state level over the past few years." ("Spending Bill Hits Wall With Moderates," Politico, 10/19/11)

SEN. MARY LANDRIEU (D-LA): "...said she was not convinced that the overall bill was 'the right way forward.'" ("Jobs Bill Momentum Eludes Senate Democrats," CQ, 10/18/11)

SEN. JIM WEBB (D-VA): "Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, for one, opposes the bill because of how it is paid for..." ("Joe Biden Plugs Jobs Bill At Hill Rally," Politico, 10/19/11)

###
SENATE REPUBLICAN COMMUNICATIONS CENTER

202.228.NEWS

Enhanced by Zemanta
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/senate-democrats-block-importa.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions

By NICK TIMIRAOS

The reeling housing market has come to this: To shore it up, two Senators are preparing to introduce a bipartisan bill Thursday that would give residence visas to foreigners who spend at least $500,000 to buy houses in the U.S.

The provision is part of a larger package of immigration measures, co-authored by Sens. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Mike Lee (R., Utah), designed to spur more foreign investment in the U.S.

[IMMIGHOME] Getty ImagesSupporters of the bill, co-authored by Sen. Charles Schumer, say it would help make up for American buyers who are holding back.

Foreigners have accounted for a growing share of home purchases in South Florida, Southern California, Arizona and other hard-hit markets. Chinese and Canadian buyers, among others, are taking advantage not only of big declines in U.S. home prices and reduced competition from Americans but also of favorable foreign exchange rates.

To fuel this demand, the proposed measure would offer visas to any foreigner making a cash investment of at least $500,000 on residential real-estate--a single-family house, condo or townhouse. Applicants can spend the entire amount on one house or spend as little as $250,000 on a residence and invest the rest in other residential real estate, which can be rented out.

The measure would complement existing visa programs that allow foreigners to enter the U.S. if they invest in new businesses that create jobs.

 

Read the rest at The Wall Street Journal

Enhanced by Zemanta
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/foreigners-sweetener-buy-house.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions

'The American people didn't send us here to kick our problems down the road. And they certainly didn't send us here to repeat the same mistakes over and over again -- and then stick them and their children with the tab. That might be how you maintain a sense of urgency, by failing to solve the problem the first two times around. But it isn't how you solve a jobs crisis. The American people deserve better than this.'

 

Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following statement on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding the President's failed stimulus and the need for a new approach to solve the jobs crisis:

"It's no secret that the vast majority of Americans aren't happy with Washington right now. They say that 13 percent of the public approve of Congress, but I for one haven't met many of them.

"It's also no secret that the President of the United States is trying to use this displeasure with Washington for political gain. And I think that's a pretty sad commentary on the state of affairs over at the White House these days.

"As the only person elected to represent every American, the President should speak for all Americans, especially in times of crisis, not divide them for short-term partisan political gain.

"But it's perfectly obvious why the President would find the path of division appealing -- because on the number one issue we face, jobs and the economy, the President's policies haven't worked as advertised.

"After nearly three years in office, he's failed to make good on his promises to turn the jobs crisis around. And I think you can pretty much sum up that failure with a single number: 1.5 million. That's how many fewer jobs there are right now in America since the President signed his first stimulus, according to the Obama administration's own Labor Department: 1.5 million.

"So he's trying to change the topic.

"He wants to deflect attention from that record.

"He wants people to think that the problem isn't his policies.  It's those mean Republicans in Congress who oppose them.

"But the President leaves a few things out of the reelection script that he brought along on his bus tour.

"First of all, it wasn't just the Republicans who defeated his latest stimulus bill last week.

"The only reason a majority of Democrats voted to debate it is they knew they wouldn't have to vote for it.

"That's why the Majority Leader repeatedly moved to block a vote on the measure itself.

"Second: we're now living under economic policies that President Obama himself put in place.

"This isn't something you'll hear on the bus tour, but let's be clear: the President got everything he wanted from a Democrat-controlled Congress during the first two years of his Presidency.

"Now we're living with the hard reality that those policies have brought to bear on the American worker.

"So at this point, anytime the President says 'pass this bill,' people have very good reason to be skeptical.

"Because this isn't the first time President Obama's demanded that Congresses pass what he calls a 'jobs bill.'

"But if this one were to pass, and it worked as advertised, then it would be the first one that did.

"Again and again, the President's response to America's ongoing jobs crisis has been to insist that Congress pass some urgent piece of legislation right away, or an even worse calamity would result. Those bills were supposed to create jobs and prevent layoffs too. But he keeps coming back for more.

"I guess the President is counting on the American people to forget that part. He's counting on us to forget about the other stimulus legislation he's already signed into law, and that it's failed to live up to the hype every time.

"Again and again, the President has demanded that Congress do something to create jobs -- and the only thing we seem to end up with at the end of the day is more debt, more government, and fewer jobs.

"Let's just review the record for a second.

"Two and a half years ago, President Obama went down to Florida and said the first stimulus -- the nearly one trillion dollar government spending bill he signed shortly after taking office -- would save or create millions of jobs, including jobs for firefighters, nurses, police officers, and teachers.

"What happened?

"Well, the states got their bailout, the national unemployment rate didn't budge, and a year and a half later, the President was back asking for another one.

"That's right, a year and a half after the first stimulus, the White House was back last August, saying they needed another $26 billion right away or else 160,000 teachers would get pink slips, and police and firefighters across the country would be off the job.  And what happened then?

"Well, the states got another bailout, the unemployment rate didn't budge, and now the President's riding around on a bus saying that if they don't get another one, teachers, police and firefighters will lose their jobs. Again.

"Anybody notice a pattern here?

"We've been doing this for nearly three years now. It doesn't work as advertised.

"Bailouts don't solve the problem. They perpetuate it.

"Yet all we get from the President and Democrats in Congress is 'Do it again -- or else!'

"We've been mired in a jobs crisis for three years now, and all Democrats ever want to do is throw more taxpayer money at it.

"It never works the way they claim it will.

"And yet they want to keep doing it with other people's money.

"Just throw another bailout together, slap the word 'jobs' on the cover page, and dare people to vote against it.

"That's the Democrats' governing philosophy -- three years into this jobs crisis.

"It wouldn't be irresponsible to oppose an approach like this; it would be irresponsible to consider it.

"It didn't work the first time. It didn't work the second time.

"The third time won't be the charm.

"And that's why Republicans, and a growing number of our Democrat friends, want a different approach.

"There is growing bipartisan opposition to trying the same failed policies again.

"And there's bipartisan opposition to raising taxes, especially at a time when 14 million Americans are out of work.

"I mean, if there's one thing we should agree on right now it's that we should be making it easier for businesses to hire, not harder.

"So, the President should drop his obsession with raising taxes.

"And if he really wants to create jobs, maybe he should consider doing something different.

"They've tried the bailout approach.

"They've tried more regulations, more debt and more taxes.

"Let's try a new idea for a change.

"One that has bipartisan support.

"One that isn't a two-time proven failure.

"Let's try something that might actually work.

"Because the American people didn't send us here to kick our problems down the road. And they certainly didn't send us here to repeat the same mistakes over and over again -- and then stick them and their children with the tab. That might be how you maintain a sense of urgency, by failing to solve the problem the first two times around. But it isn't how you solve a jobs crisis.

"The American people deserve better than this.

"They deserve better than false promises they're getting.

"The President got everything he wanted from a Democrat-led Congress for two years.

"A health care law that was designed to take over of one-sixth of the entire U.S. economy.

"A financial reform bill that punishes businesses that had nothing to do with the financial crisis.

"Out-of-control regulations that are forcing otherwise healthy businesses to shut down -- businesses like Smart Papers in Hamilton Ohio, a paper mill that said last week it's shutting down because of onerous new federal regulations that make it too costly to do business.

"And a trillion dollar stimulus that was supposed to solve this jobs crisis two and half years ago.

"For two years, when he said 'Pass this bill right away,' Democrats acted. And here's what we got despite all that: trillions in debt and more than a million and a half fewer jobs.

"We don't need more of that. We can't afford more of the same."

Enhanced by Zemanta
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/mcconnell-lets-try-something-t.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/postal-reform-that-doesnt-go-p.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions
| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) Sphere'>http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://hardstarboardblog.com/2011/10/ryanpalooza.html">Sphere: Related Content View blog reactions

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the Capitol Hill category.

Bush Presidential Library is the previous category.

Chronicles of JASmius is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

2004-2007

1996-2000

Best of JASmius

Television & Movie Reviews/Multimedia

The Sports Page

Powered by Movable Type 5.12

 Subscribe to Hard Starboard

 Subscribe to Hard Starboard

As linked by Real Clear Politics

"Hard Starboard has some relevant thoughts....the most original, and humorous, I've seen so far." - "Ensign" Ed Morrissey
Google
Technorati search
View blog authority

Blogs that link here

Add to Technorati Favorites
Solar X-rays:

Geomagnetic Field:
>
Status
Status
 
From n3kl.org Evangelical Blogroll

Sermon Archive

Out Of The Miry Clay

Due On Christmas

God Made Playdough

Growing Together

Jenaya’s Quote Board

Little Pink Feet

Living A Quiet Life

Martinbliss

Rachel’s Blog

Red-Headed Wilsons

Ryan & Stephanie Buczak

The Adventures Of The SuperMillers

Tim Miller's Arabian Adventure

The Fenton Four

The Miller Brothers

The Terrible Tuesday Machine

Wycliffe Support

Institute for Creation Research

Klingon Gospel Wheel